About the lowest, most disgusting job most men and a few women will ever have is working as a gas jockey at a gas station where self-service is not permitted, as in New Jersey.
Gas jockeys breathe gasoline fumes and car exhaust for 8 hours each shift. The gas-buying public is disgusting to the gas jockeys. Bad weather multiplies the suffering greatly.
In night time gas stations, occasionally a buyer tries to skip without paying for the gas, even driving away at a high speed dragging the hose down the street. The station virtually always tries to back the costs out of employee salaries, and succeeds -- so that the folks who steal gas are almost always stealing from the employee -- not the station. And, of course, there are armed robberies.
I was robbed twice at gun point, as I worked at a gas station on Roosevelt Boulevard in Northeast Philadelphia to help make ends meet during law school.
On another occasion, in the wee hours of the morning after the June 22, 1976 appearance of the Grateful Dead in concert at the Tower Theater in Philadelphia, some guys in a Grateful Dead cube van who had me gas-up their truck in that Roosevelt Boulevard gas station in the middle of the night after the concert stole about $100 worth of cigarettes from the cigarette display on one side of the truck as I gassed it up on the other side. That $100 came out of my pay.
On another occasion, it was a horrible, snowy day and night during one Christmas holiday season. The station managers asked me to work a double shift for double pay each shift. I needed the money, then, so I agreed.
But my feet froze -- so bad, on one foot, that the sock froze to my frozen big toe, and the toe clicked when you tapped it with metal. The doctor at Frankford Hospital said, "Frostbite. Sorry, but that toe is coming off!"
I responded, "Nope. It's not going to happen."
The doctor insisted, "When it defrosts, it will turn gangrenous and you will die."
"No," I responded calmly, "You do not have permission to remove my toe. That's my big toe. Removing it will change everything. Let's begin a course of antibiotics, now, while it is frozen, and we'll decide later if we need to remove it."
I was a jogger in those days. As the flesh on my right big toe rotted and fell off, I walked and walked and walked, and jogged and jogged and jogged. Finally, after about 6 months, the toe looked 100%, but only about 50% of the sensation returned. But I still have a big toe on my right foot, 40 years later.
Because I know that the life in a gas station is horrible like this, I always tip the gas jockeys in our Magnolia, New Jersey gas stations, when I buy a load of gas.
I learned, early-on in that work, that the advantage of premium gas isn't just higher octane. It is the detergents mixed in with the gas which prevent a build-up of molecular debris on engine parts. That kind of advantage didn't matter much in the 1970s. But, as the Environmental Protection Agency screwed the lid on automobile exhaust gases tighter and tighter and tighter, and things like the MAP sensor and O2 sensors became standard features in American autos, in the 1980s and 1990s I learned very fast that I could avoid blowing about $1,400 in auto mechanic's fees every year for two cars by always putting-in premium gas, not regular, so that detergents keep the sensors clean.
The $1,400 annual cost for replacing MAP and oxygen sensors in two cars immediately vanished, and the life of the sensors in each car suddenly became indefinite.
As I described the savings in repair bills caused by using only premium gas in cars whose manuals said, "Use regular gas," to family, friends and clients, the question always arose, "Which costs more? Regular gas, plus the $700 per car annual repair bill, or premium gas, with an occasional sensor replacement -- say, once every 5 years?"
Asking that question led to another debate: Does premium gas pay for itself, in raw miles per gallon?
The argument on this has been going back-and-forth for decades.
Tommy and Ray, on the Car Talk Show on Public Radio, in essence swear that they can't find a difference in miles-per-gallon between regular and premium ...
http://www.cartalk.com/content/premium-vs-regular-0
However, I can't believe that they are correct. I have heard those guys err on basic car issues before, and though they say that octane varies more wildly in gas loads for the same ostensible octane level than it does between regular and premium gas, per se, I have seen octane-mixing systems within gas pumps -- the trucks mostly deliver pink "high octane" and clear "low octane" gas, and the gas pump itself mixes the two to generate slightly-pink "plus," the in-between 89 octane gasoline. I also saw the Weights-and-Measures guys come into the gas stations I worked in, and check on the octane, and it was dead-on, as advertised.
So, premium gas has 91 octane (or 93 if you buy that super-duper Sunoco stuff) while regular has 87 octane -- so that premium is 105% of regular, in terms of power, right?
Tommy and Ray say that use of "corn fuel" -- ethanol -- changes the equation even more. But I can't believe that on the average it changes the equation for regular and premium. In other words, on the average, they don't change the equation at all. The question still is, On the average, will someone with a tank of premium gas press the gas peddle 5% less per mile than someone with a tank of regular gas?
Come on! Hotter is hotter. More powerful is more powerful. Doesn't it have to be the case?
Once, years ago, I did The Experiment. Like Kramer in Seinfeld, I ran my gas tank down to absolute zero before I pulled into the gas station, and I filled-up with regular instead of premium.
I don't remember the exact number of miles for that tank of gas, but I do remember the percentage difference in miles per gallon for that fill -- 6%. I got a solid 6% decrease in miles per gallon on regular than on premium. (I did that test with a 2001 Dodge Caravan.)
I admit that I only did the test once. But, there you are.
Now, the problem with that 6% increase in miles per gallon for premium is that on the average premium gas costs 10% more than regular.
So, that leaves us with the question, Is the average annual savings in sensor replacement costs and other repair bills more subtly connected to regular use of cheaper gas equal to or greater than the 4% net increase in premium gas expense beyond cents-per-mile savings?
Since it looks like, with premium, that we are replacing sensors about 20% as much as with regular gas, due to detergents in premium, the question comes down to, "Is 80% of $700 greater than 4% of the annual cost of gas?"
By a mile.
If we calculate-in the invisible-but-painfully-tangible costs of car down-time due to repair, investing in premium gas use, only, is incredibly smarter than using regular gas, only.
So, pay the extra 10% per gallon. Get premium as, only.
I always tip my gas station attendant $5.
ReplyDelete